Why content templates compound
Top performers don't write each post from scratch. They have 5-10 proven structures (hook + value + CTA, comparison thread, listicle, case study) and slot fresh details into them.
Mirgent's template system encodes those structures as reusable assets. You save a winner once; AI uses it as a pattern when generating future drafts. Quality compounds; writing time drops.
Scheduling
Save winners as templates with one click
Lead Discovery
Placeholders for variable content
AI Agents
AI uses templates as few-shot examples
Analytics
Track which templates perform best
Build your first template
Three minute setup. Use a recent high-performing post as the seed.
Find a winner
Open Analytics → Top Posts (last 30 days). Pick the best-performing one. The structure is what you want to template, not the specific topic.
Save as template
Open the post → click 'Save as Template'. Mirgent extracts the structure (hook, body, CTA), prompts you to add placeholders for variable parts.
Name + tag
Name it something findable ('B2B Comparison Thread', 'Solo Founder Hook'). Tag with platform + use case so the right template surfaces when you need it.
Templates with 2-4 placeholders work best. Too few = inflexible; too many = same as writing from scratch. Start with hook + value + CTA placeholders.
Placeholder syntax
Mirgent's templates use {{ variable }} syntax. Variables can be required (must be filled), optional (defaults if empty), or AI-generated (Mirgent fills automatically).
{{ topic }}, required
User must supply when applying the template. Surfaces as a form field in the composer.
{{ company:Mirgent }}, optional with default
Pre-fills with 'Mirgent' if not overridden. Useful for branded content where the company name is usually constant.
{{ ai:hook }}, AI-generated
AI generates the value at draft time using the surrounding context. Most powerful for hooks, CTAs, and platform-specific tweaks.
AI few-shot training
Templates double as few-shot examples for AI agents. When Content Planner drafts a new post, it references your top 3 templates as 'this is what good looks like for this user'.
Tag templates with metadata
Mark templates as 'high-performer' (above your engagement median). AI weights these heavier in the few-shot context.
Per-platform templates
Twitter templates differ from LinkedIn structurally. Save platform-tagged templates so AI uses Twitter winners for Twitter drafts and LinkedIn winners for LinkedIn drafts.
Template-pack rotation
Group templates into packs ('Launch Week', 'Retention Funnel', 'Hiring'). Activate the right pack when you're in that mode; AI focuses few-shot context on relevant winners only.
Template library examples
Five templates we see most-used across the Mirgent community.
Scheduling Guide
Calendar, kanban, and queue modes
AI Agents Guide
Configure autonomous AI workflows
Integrations
Connect RSS feeds and platforms
Lead Discovery Guide
Find leads on Twitter and Reddit
Pitfalls with templates
Template misuse that hurts performance.
- Using templates verbatim too often. Same hook + same CTA across 20 posts looks templated to the algorithm. Rotate 5+ templates per platform; use each at most weekly.
- Templates that are too rigid. {{ topic }} alone produces robotic content. Add {{ ai:hook }} and {{ ai:close }} so AI tunes the surrounding language.
- Saving templates from low-performers. Only template the winners. Below-median posts encode the wrong patterns; AI will reproduce mediocrity.
- Too many active templates. Above ~15 templates per platform, AI's few-shot context becomes diluted. Curate to top 5-10 per platform; archive the rest.
Template recipes
Three structures that work consistently across Mirgent users.
Hook-Value-CTA (Twitter, 3 placeholders)
{{ ai:hook }} → 1 specific insight about {{ topic }} → {{ ai:cta }}. Works for daily Twitter cadence; AI handles the rhetorical bits while you supply the topic substance.
Comparison thread (LinkedIn, 5 placeholders)
Heading: '{{ topic_a }} vs {{ topic_b }}, honest take'. Body: pros of A, pros of B, when each wins, your recommendation. Closes with {{ ai:cta }}. Best for B2B thought leadership.
Listicle with case study (LinkedIn long-form)
{{ ai:hook }} → '5 things I learned from {{ specific_event }}' → 5 numbered insights, each with concrete number → close with {{ ai:cta }}. Format that drives 3-5x engagement above baseline.
{guide_tmpl_walk4_title}
{guide_tmpl_walk4_desc}
{guide_tmpl_walk5_title}
{guide_tmpl_walk5_desc}
Templates FAQ
Can I share templates with my team?
Yes, workspace-scoped. Anyone with workspace access sees and uses the same templates. Cross-workspace sharing via export-import as JSON.
Do templates work with non-English content?
Yes. Save templates in your target language; AI generates content in the same language. Language consistency is at template-level, not workspace-level.
How does Mirgent know which templates to surface?
By platform tag + recency + performance. The composer surfaces top 5 platform-matching templates by your engagement-rate score from analytics.
Can I import templates from other tools?
Manual import only, paste content, mark placeholders, save. We don't have an automated import from Buffer / Hootsuite templates because format conventions differ enough that auto-translation produces broken templates more often than working ones.
What happens to my analytics on templated posts?
Each post tracks both its content metrics AND its template. You can see 'Template X performs 40% above template Y' over time. Use this to retire underperforming templates and double down on winners.
{guide_tmpl_faq6_q}
{guide_tmpl_faq6_a}